The Constitutional Court did not judge the illegality of the emergency martial law, although it said that acting Prime Minister Han Deok-soo was not actively involved in the December 3 emergency martial law. There have been observations that the results of Han's impeachment trial will be a preview of Yoon Suk Yeol's impeachment trial, but analysts say that the Constitutional Court has not given a clear "hint."

The Constitutional Court did not specifically determine whether President Yoon's act of emergency martial law, such as the emergency martial law declaration, constitutes an act of rebellion or violation of the Constitution and the law.

Hong Wan-sik, a professor at Konkuk University Law School, said, "It seems that the government has decided to reject the decision, and it seems that it is enough to communicate its opinion even if it does not make a specific judgment on the emergency martial law cabinet meeting." "I think it is because it was enough to passively judge and judge the rest of the issues because it is the same issue as President Yoon."

It is also noteworthy that the Constitutional Court's judgment on acting authority Han was not unanimously made. Professor Hong said, "There are many people who predict 8-0 citations, and I think there is a high possibility that opinions will be divided based on the results of Han's acting."

Some observers say that it will not directly affect the impeachment trial of President Yoon. Kwon Hyung-doon, a law professor at Gongju National University, predicted, "It is highly likely that the results of Han's impeachment trial will not affect President Yoon's impeachment trial."

[Reporter Kwon Sunwoo]